Clear, Simple, and Wrong: A Response to the AAUP Journal of Academic Freedom, Volume 4

By Peter Haas

The famous American cultural critic, H.L. Mencken, once said that, “For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.” I am reminded of this bon mot every time I hear of a BDS campaign that claims to be putting forward a simple answer to the Israel-Palestine problem by proposing a boycott of Israeli goods, divesting in some company or refusing to talk with some Israeli professor. What makes Mencken’s observation apt here is that the Israel Palestinian conflict is virtually the definition of a complex problem. In fact it is a complex problem that is itself part of a very much larger complex problem, or set of problems, that have bedeviled the vast territory of the Middle East for generations if not centuries. It is self-evident to anyone who knows the region that the political, social, religious and economic strains of the Middle East reflect deep set structural problems that were institutionalized by the British and the French in the wake of the collapse of the Ottoman Turkish empire. But even that is an oversimplification since the British and French were already in the 1920’s dealing with a tumultuous region, a region which had been causing problems for the Turks themselves way before World War I. My point in saying the obvious is to highlight how profoundly naive it is to think that the Israel-Palestinian problem has taken shape as some isolated disturbance that can be addressed and solved in a simple, surgical and painless way . To approach the conflict from this position offers, á la Mencken, a clear and simple answer, that even on the very face of it, is wrong.

Even ignoring the historical dimension, it is easy to see that even logically, the BDS campaign, and its odd offspring the academic boycott, are based on at least three false premises. One is that what is happening today between Israelis and Palestinians is sufficiently similar to apartheid that once held sway in South Africa such that what applied to the one must perforce apply to the other. Now similes or metaphors can certainly be useful analytic and teaching tools as we all know from our own work as academicians, but at the end of the day we also all know that similes and metaphors are just that, similes and metaphors. Our job as academicians is to move from similes and metaphors to correct and accurate descriptions of the unique problem with which we are dealing. Now I have to admit that I am old enough to remember real apartheid and the campaigns against it. I even participated in some anti-apartheid protests as a college student. But anyone who knows the Middle East knows that real apartheid of South Africa was a quite different thing in content, history, form, context and everything else from what is happening in the Middle East today. Thus to state that what is happening in Israel and Palestine is apartheid is not only to posit a bad metaphor, but is to distort also the history and memory of the real apartheid that once was. At the core of this false premise is that the step from metaphor to accurate description has not been accomplished, a monumental academic failure.

View the entire article "Clear, Simple, and Wrong: A Response to the AAUP Journal of Academic Freedom, Volume 4."

Add new comment

We welcome your comments. See our commenting policy.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Refresh Type the characters you see in this picture.
Type the characters you see in the picture; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.  Switch to audio verification.