On September 29, as we transition to a new database, you may be unable to log in to your member account or access member-only content on the AAUP website.
Due to concerns about COVID-19, the AAUP office has transitioned to telework. Please contact staff by email.
Abstract:
Despite a long list of judicial decisions striking down broadly worded university speech codes, universities continue to promulgate and enforce such policies under various guises. This essay examines a case in which a committee of administrators and faculty sought to punish a student for a racist Facebook message alleged to be harassment, a threat, disorderly conduct, and a disruption. On the one side, the committee claimed its action was supported by legal doctrines regarding contracts; time, place, and manner restrictions; captive audiences; student social media use; and the university’s zero tolerance policy. On the other side, faculty First Amendment advocates argued the student’s speech was protected speech. This article attempts to lay out the arguments on both sides and establish that the student’s speech (and speech like it) is so clearly protected that the administrators and faculty who attempt to punish it should lose qualified immunity if sued.
View the entire article The Case of the Student Racist Facebook Message
Add new comment