The Canadian Model: A Potential Solution to Institutional Review Board Overreach

By James Nichols


Over the past four decades, institutional review boards have evolved into somewhat unwieldy beasts. The once-modest safety control has grown into thousands of independently operating ethical review boards called institutional review boards (IRBs). While the power of these boards has grown, there is little legislation that controls or even guides these boards in their attempt to protect human research subjects. As a result, scholars are being forced to edit seemingly harmless research after, during, or even before it has begun. Despite the current system, the concerns of academic freedom of research and human safety are not opposing forces, but can coexist in a manner that promotes intuitive and promising research without sacrificing human integrity and protection. All it would take to realize this balance is minor legislative adaptations mirroring the recent changes in review boards adopted in Canada.

Download "The Canadian Model: A Potential Solution to Institutional Review Board Overreach" or read below.

Add new comment

We welcome your comments. See our commenting policy.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.